FigTrig reviews every underwriting decision against your own rules. It reads the note, checks it against your guidelines, and flags anything incomplete, inconsistent, or out of appetite. A tireless second set of eyes.
Handled to GDPR standards, with processing agreements before you go live.
Never shared with other customers. Your guidelines, your tenant.
Your underwriting data is never used to train our models.
Choose where your data lives and how long it's retained.
Most teams review 5–10% of decisions by hand. The gaps that cause real losses live in the other 90%.
FigTrig reads every note as it comes in, not just a manual spot-check.
Continuous QAGenuine issues caught in our first pilot, surfaced while there was still time to act.
From a single pilotUpload your guidelines once. FigTrig learns your standards, not a generic set. No long implementation project.
Tailored to youEverything your team needs to check, defend, and improve every decision, in one place behind the underwriters.
FigTrig reads each note and checks it against the things that matter most in any underwriting decision.
Reviewed the moment a note lands, before anyone has read it.
Upload guidelines once. FigTrig learns your standards.
Every flag cites the exact section of your guidelines it relates to. A clear record for claims and regulatory review.
Sits alongside your existing underwriting system. No rip-and-replace.
Plain-language reasons, not a black box. The underwriter always makes the call.
No long implementation project. Most teams are reviewing live notes within a week.
The note records Grade A pricing but does not justify the rate against the identified risks. This decision cannot be defended in a claims or regulatory review as written.
See rule UW-114 · Pricing guidelines 2026, §3.2“FigTrig caught a pricing rationale gap on a £1.8M commercial property risk that would have gone straight to binding. It flagged the issue within seconds, before anyone on the team had even read the note.”Senior UnderwriterCommercial Lines, London Market
When regulators investigated, they found the same root cause every time: underwriting decisions were not being checked against the rules. Notes were written. Policies were bound. But nobody was asking whether the decisions were right.
Management had no visibility. By the time the losses surfaced, it was too late to act. This is the default state of most underwriting operations today.
Most teams are reviewing live notes within one week. You upload your guidelines once: your rules, authority levels, and risk appetite. FigTrig learns your standards. No long implementation project or integration required to start.
You upload your guidelines in whatever format they exist: PDFs, Word documents, internal manuals. FigTrig reads and indexes them, then checks every note against those exact standards. It does not use a generic model trained on other insurers' rules.
Yes. Your data is never used to train our models or shared with other customers. All data is handled in accordance with GDPR, and we can discuss data residency, retention periods, and processing agreements before you go live.
FigTrig explains exactly what it flagged and why, referencing the specific section of your guidelines that was not addressed. Your team reviews the flag and decides how to proceed. FigTrig surfaces the issue; the underwriter makes the call.
FigTrig can work alongside your existing underwriting management system via API or by reviewing submitted notes through a lightweight integration. We discuss your specific setup on the demo call and design the workflow around what you already have.
Bring a few of your own notes and we'll show you exactly what FigTrig flags, and why. No commitment required.